GJJ Games Review - Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web by Keifer Art Inc.

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web
Designers: Lucy Keifer, James Keifer
Publisher: Keifer Art Inc.
3-6p | 20-40m | 

GJJ Games Review - Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web by Keifer Art Inc.
Disclaimer Support me on Patreon!

Game Overview:

When I was at the Chicago Toy and Game Fair (ChiTAG Fair) in November I met a bunch of great game designers and publishers.  One of the games that really caught my eye was Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web.  At the time my wife and I were in the middle of binge watching the Sherlock series, and my wife loves almost anything to do with Sherlock Holmes (Consulting Detective is one of her favorite games of all time), so the great artwork and theme really caught my interest.  I spent a while talking to James Keifer, the publisher of the game and father of the designer, Lucy Keifer (and the artist Emily Keifer - yes, this is a true family production).  I came away with a copy of the game to review, but more importantly, I came away with a game that my wife was really excited to play!  In fact, we played it the very next day, and then a few more times that week.

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web is a tile laying, pattern matching puzzle game for up to six players.  Players take on the roles of Sherlock, Watson, Lestrade, Mycroft, Irene Adler, or Mrs. Hudson to work cooperatively and solve Moriarty's crimes.  They'll be matching patterns on Location, Witness, Clue, and Informant tiles to connect a path from each Crime tile all the way back to the Moriarty tile.  The game is more about solving a pattern and spatial puzzle than it is about unraveling clues like in Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective, but it's still a mystery that needs to be solved.

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web is available on their website (www.sherlockholmesandmoriartysweb.com), Amazon, and maybe in your FLGS (ask them to order it from ACD Distribution if they don't have it).  It's $45 and takes about 20-40 minutes.  Officially the game supports only 3-6 players, but I've played fine with just two (each taking two characters), and since it's coop you can even play solo.  It's really the number of characters used that matters, not the number of players controlling them.

Components & Packaging:
The components in Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web are very nice.  The game comes with 54 tiles of varying sizes and shapes, 45 large cards, six tokens, and six plastic stands.  The tiles are all top notch with linen finish.  There are six different types of tiles: Crimes, Witnesses, Informants, Clues, Locations, and, of course, Moriarty.  There are also six character tiles that have a short bio and a description of the character's special ability.

The game is chock full of gorgeous tiles.

The cards are larger than standard poker cards a bit thinner than most, and don't have the linen finish (a shame since they do get shuffled one to three times a game).  The cards are an unusual size, too (3" x 4" or 76mm x 102mm), so you won't be able to find sleeves easily, if at all.

The Moriarty cards look great, but they're thin and won't fit in any sleeves I know of.

There are six plastic stands for the six character tiles, which is odd though since the tiles are too big to use as character standees in the game (there are six wooden discs for that).  I've found that I prefer to play without the stands for the character cards.  The six wooden discs are colored to match the character tiles, but I think I would have preferred actual character standee tiles.  The discs work fine though.

Everything looks great, but the character cards are too big to be standees and the discs are a bit boring.

The box is average thickness, so nothing special there, although it is linen finished, just like the tiles.  The insert, however, is another story.  The game comes with a plastic insert that has a place perfect for every single component.  Every tile, card, token, and stand has a perfectly sized insert to hold everything snugly in place.  Some of the compartments even have small lips to make sure the top component doesn't pop out of place.  I store this game on it's side and have never had a single piece out of place when opening it up, even after tipping the game upside down!  There's even an extra space for the Kickstarter exclusive 'found object' character tokens, even though most copies of the game (mine included) don't have those items.  There are only two extremely minor issues with the insert.  First, the snug fit won't allow for card sleeves, although that likely won't be an issue if you can't find sleeves that fit.  Second, there's no room for any expansion items, which again won't be an issue if there aren't going to be any expansions.  However, a Sherlock Holmes theme just screams for more content, so who knows.

This is an awesome insert, even though it doesn't allow room for any future expansions.

I'd be missing a huge aspect of the game if I neglected to mention the artwork.  The artwork is absolutely gorgeous.  It's not bright and colorful, or beautiful landscapes like many other gorgeous games have lately, but everything is done in sepia tones, black, gray, and brown ink washes.  Only the characters have a smidgen of color.  Combined with the gorgeous typography and graphic design, this game just oozes Victorian English theme.  The odd shaped tiles and gorgeous artwork really make this an eye catching game on the table.  Artist Emily Keifer did an incredible job with this game.

All the artwork is extremely thematic and gorgeous!

Score: 8/10 x1

Rules & Setup:
Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web is a fairly simple game, mechanically.  It's pretty fast to set up, especially with all the components already separated in the great insert.  Simply place the Moriarty tile in the center of the table.  Then shuffle each other type of tile (Crimes, Locations, Clues, and Witnesses - Informants are all the same, except for the artwork) as well as the Moriarty cards and place them in their own stacks face-down to the side of the playing area.

Then decide how many and which characters will be played.  The fewer characters used the more difficult the game will be.  I recommend playing with at least three characters, and felt the game is best with four, although you can play with as many as all six.  The number of players doesn't matter as much as the number of characters used.  Take the corresponding character tiles and tokens and give them to the player controlling each.

Decide on the level of difficulty and draw three to five Crime tiles, with a standard difficulty game starting with four Crimes.  Finally, draw one clue per character and lay them in the center of the table, not touching any other tiles, with a character token on each one.  Now you're all set-up and ready to play!

All set up for a game with four characters.

The rules are also pretty simple.  On each character's turn you'll go through three steps: Add a Tile, Move and Make Connections, and Draw Moriarty Cards.  The first thing you'll do is draw a tile from one of the stacks and place it face-up in the play area, not connected to any other tiles.

Next is where the meat of the game comes in.  This is also where most of the cooperative strategy gets discussed.  You are allowed to move up to two times.  A move consists of moving your character token to any other connected tile.  It doesn't have to be an adjacent tile, your token can move as far as you like, as long as the tiles it's moving through are connected.  At any time, before, or after a move (so before your first move, between your first and second moves, or after your second move) you can make and break connections.

Characters can move to any tile connected to the web, regardless of distance.

You can only make connections to the tile your character occupies, but these connections can be any tiles that are in play, whether they're orphaned tiles (i.e. not connected to anything), tiles already connected somewhere else, or even a chain of tiles that are connected somewhere else, or on their own.  Simply slide the tile(s) you wish to connect over to the tile your character is on.  Remember, you can break connections anywhere on the board, but once broken you can only make connections to the tile your character is on.

Now, not just any tiles can connect.  Each tile has two to four of the nine different patterns on its edges.  Locations and Clues each have two patterns, Witnesses have three, and Informants have four patterns.  Each Crime has one of four patterns on it.  To connect any two tile you must match the patterns on the adjoining edges of the tiles.  However that's not all.  Each type of tile has a distinct shape and the tiles have to also fit together on the board without overlapping other tiles.  So even though you may have two sides open for two connections, you might only be able to fit one tile there.  Or maybe neither tile depending on the layout of other tiles in the web.  This makes for a super interesting spatial puzzle in addition to the pattern matching.  It does get a little fiddly, and sometimes things will fit if you 'fudge' the connection just a little, so it's not a perfect system, but for the most part you'll know if tiles fit or not.

It gets a little fiddly at times, but the spatial element of the game can be fascinating.

Oh, and just so you're aware, there's not necessarily an even distribution of patterns on the tiles.  There are definitely some patterns that are more common than others, making some crimes more difficult to solve than others.  As you get to learn the game, you'll also start to learn which types of tiles are better for solving which crimes.

Once you've finished making up to two moves and the possible connections, you'll take a look at how many unsolved Crimes there are.  An unsolved Crime is a crime that does not yet connect back to Moriarty.  I.e. there is not a consecutive path of tiles from the Crime to the Moriarty tile.  Crimes can be completely unconnected to anything, or connected to some tiles, but if they don't eventually connect to Moriarty they're unsolved.  For each unsolved Crime, draw one Moriarty card.  Then resolve the Moriarty cards in any order.

Sometimes Moriarty cards won't do a thing to your cases, other times they'll take out key clues,
like the clue that was connecting two Crimes to Moriarty here.

Deciding how to resolve the Moriarty cards also spurs quite a bit of discussion.  There are two main types of Moriarty cards; cards that remove tiles from play, and cards that add additional Crimes to the web.  Adding additional Crimes just makes the game that much harder to win.  Moriarty cards might steal a Clue, kidnap a Witness, or remove a Location, and some of the cards may name a single item, e.g. Moriarty Kidnaps the Flower Seller, or a group of items, e.g. Moriarty steals the Cracked Glasses, Unusual Top Hat, or Footprint, or just a type of item and the players decide which one, e.g. A Clue Disappears.

Deciding what sequence to play the Moriarty cards in can sometimes be a big deal.

It is possible to protect these tiles from being removed if there are two characters on the tile (although some character abilities can change this), but generally if Moriarty wants to steal something, he will.  If a character's token is on the removed tile, that character has been kidnapped by Moriarty and must be rescued before the character can move or make connections again.  Move the token to the Moriarty tile and another player will have to move to Moriarty for one move, and then off of Moriarty, bringing the kidnapped character with, for the second move.  The sequence that the Moriarty cards are resolved can make a big difference, so there will usually be quite a bit of discussion.  Sometimes activating one Moriarty card will make another card ineffective.

Once the Moriarty cards are resolved, play passes on to the next character (kidnapped characters only draw a new tile and then Moriarty cards).  The game continues until either all the active Crimes are solved, all characters have been kidnapped, or a Moriarty card says to add another Crime, but all nine crimes are out already.  Once a game all players can get a single pass from the Queen to ignore a Moriarty card, so you only have one second chance.

As the game progresses you'll create a large web of clues, crimes, witnesses, and locations.

Overall, the rules are pretty clear and straight forward.  There are a few questions that might come up, but the designer has answered pretty much all of the questions on Board Game Geek.  The biggest question I had is if a card says Moriarty steals one of several items, but one of those items is being protected, can that be the item Moriarty tries to steal?  Or does he go for an unprotected item?  The official answer from Lucy, the designer, is that Moriarty steals an item if he can, however it's an acceptable variant to have him attempt the protected item for a slightly simpler game.

Score: 9/10 x2

Gameplay:
I was very excited to play Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web, as was my wife and sons.  We were really thrilled with the theme and pattern matching mechanics, so we made time to play it the day after we got it.  After one play, my first impression was that the game was very close to great, but was just too random.  Players have no control over what Clues, Witnesses, or Locations they add to the web, so if the tiles you need to solve a crime are buried you won't win, just because the tiles don't come up when you need them.  This was particularly a problem with the three Crimes with the dots and lines pattern since there are only two Clues and one Witness that connect that Crime to anything.

Some crimes are easier to solve than others.

Unfortunately the element of chance in Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web keeps it from being a truly great game. We loved the puzzle-y aspect of trying to fit clues and witnesses together to make a path of evidence from a crime to Moriarty, but really didn't like the randomness and lack of control that resulted from just drawing blindly off the top of a pile. We ended up losing our first game, but only because we drew a Moriarty Crime card before we drew a Clue that had a matching pattern. The game came down to just hoping we got a lucky tile draw, and we didn't (the clue we needed was two more tiles down).

If you have one crime left to solve, but you never draw a clue to connect it, you're out of luck, literally.

That was disappointing because we really liked the premise and other mechanics in the game. So I started thinking if there is a way to change the game so that players have just enough control to feel like they have some influence over the cases, without breaking the game.  My variant includes a few very minor tweaks for balance, but the one that really changes the game up is simply having players draw two tiles from their chosen stack.  From those two they can choose one to play and one to return to either the top or bottom of the stack.  My hope was that this would keep the growth of the web consistent with the standard game, but give players a little more control of what clues and witnesses they encounter. Being able to put tiles on the bottom of the stacks allows them to be cycled a bit faster, avoiding the issue of clues necessary to solve a case being buried.  This is both thematic (when solving a mystery you choose what to follow up on, you don't just sit there hoping a clue will land in your lap), and helps move the game along, too.

In my variant, instead ot picking one tile, you take the top two and decide which to play.

So, a couple of nights later we played three games.  First with 6 characters and 3 crimes to start. It was finished in 5 turns and Mrs. Hudson never took a turn. Then we played with 6 characters and 5 crimes. This game was super tough and we lost because we just couldn't draw the clues we needed and couldn't do anything about that. That game felt about the same as the game we played a few days prior with 4 characters and 3 crimes. Every game felt like the game was mostly due to luck. Good luck for the game we won game, bad luck for the other two games.

Then we played with 4 characters and 3 crimes, but with my variant idea. We drew 2 tiles from a stack, then chose one to play and put the other back on the top or bottom of the stack. The game went a ton better! We felt like we actually had a little bit of control, yet it was still a bit challenging. 3 crimes was pretty easily manageable, but 4 or 5 would definitely increase difficulty. With a choice when drawing tiles this felt like a much more fulfilling game, not just a random drawfest. We had a ton more fun this way.

Even with a bit more control in the variant, the game is still a challenge.

I tried playing a few more times with my variant and made a few tweaks, but I'm now finding the game very interesting.  It still has the pattern matching and spatial alignment puzzle aspect, but now feels like you have some control of the game.  If you're interested in the full variant rules, including a few other options (like better balanced abilities for Sherlock and Mrs. Hudson, treating kidnapped characters as unsolved crimes, sending solved crimes to trial, and more), download the file from here: Sherlock-Holmes-and-Moriartys-Web-Variants.pdf

Score: 6/10 x3 (with variant: 8/10 x3)

Replayability:
Sadly, the randomness in the base game makes it just too swingy to be a great game.  It is still fun to pull out occasionally though, as long as you don't mind the possibility of winning or losing due to luck.  However, with the variant described above I find this is a game that I really enjoy.  Each game presents a new puzzle to solve and having some choice about what tiles get played really makes you feel like you are piecing together clues to solve a mystery.  This is still a lighter cooperative game, but there's enough going on where you feel like you're playing the game rather than the game playing you.

Each game will result in a new, complex web of investigations.

Score: 6/10 x1 (with variant: 7/10 x1)

General Fun:
Even with the randomness, I still found the game fun.  Unfortunately the randomness also made it frustrating, especially toward the end when it was just a matter of waiting to see if we'd get the tile that would let us win, or the card that would make us lose.  The variant above makes the game a lot more fun.  The game is still tense, and there's still enough randomness that it feels challenging, but now your'e making decisions throughout the entire game instead of just reacting to what the game throws at you.

When I read through the forum posts and rating comments of the game on Board Game Geek I noticed that a few people loved the game, but even more felt frustrated by the randomness.  I have to agree that the randomness can really suck the enjoyment out of the game.  I won't be playing without my variant now, but this is still a game that will stay in my collection with the variant.

The game forces you to think in ways you usually don't have to think in Sherlock Holmes games,
but it's just as thematic as searching for clues in newspaper articles and witness statements.

The artwork and flavor throughout the game helps add to the fun.  There are lots of fun little details in the game.  The Crimes aren't actual Holmes cases, but the titles would fit right in with the best of Doyle's classics.  I really want to know more about the Riddle of the Dancing Men, or the Mystery of the Speckled Band.  With the right group you can even tell your own story, complete with the locations, clues and witnesses that helped solve the crime.

All of the artwork is exceptional!

Score: 6/10 x2 (with variant: 8/10 x2)

Overall Value:
Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web can be purchased from www.sherlockholmesandmoriartysweb.com for $45, but with $10 shipping.  It's on Amazon for a few dollars less.  This seems a bit high, especially after factoring in shipping charges.  If you can find it at a local game store, though, you might be able to find it for a bit less.  At $35-$40 this would be a great addition to your collection if you like cooperative games, puzzle games, tile games, or Sherlock Holmes.  If you are a die-hard Sherlock Holmes fan who likes board games, this is both a good game and a great nod to Sherlock, so you'll definitely want it in your collection.

How will you solve the crimes this time?

Score: 6/10 x1

Final Thoughts:
In its base form, Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web is a bit of a disappointment.  Not because it's a bad game, it's really quite good, but because it falls just short of great.  The random tile draws lead to a sense of frustration because there's nothing you can do but wait.  Fortunately it doesn't take much to make the game great.  A few simple tweaks to the rules and you'll be playing the Sherlock Holmes game you expected.  You'll still have a good time without adding in any of the variant rules, but I won't be playing the game without them now.  Yes, I may be a bit biased because I wrote up the variants, but I'd really love to hear your opinion of them if you get the chance to play.

It looks gorgeous, keeps everyone engaged, and really makes you think, all in a fast playing game.

Fortunately the game's shortcomings are overcome with a few minor house rules.  There's no need to change or add any components, or the theme, or the main mechanics.  Those are really the core of the game and experience, and they're great.  This is a different kind of Sherlock Holmes game, one in which the clues and solutions are manifest in the physical world, not just mental puzzles.  The tiles are a great tactile connection to the thought patterns behind solving complex mysteries.  The game looks gorgeous, too.

If Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty's Web sounds like a game you might be interested in, find it on their website (www.sherlockholmesandmoriartysweb.com), Amazon, or in your FLGS (ask them to order it from ACD Distribution if they don't have it).  And be sure to download my variant here: Sherlock-Holmes-and-Moriartys-Web-Variants.pdf

Overall Score: 68/100 (with variant: 79/100)

Rating Scale

Did you like this review?  Show your support: Support me on Patreon! Also, click the heart at Board Game Links , like GJJ Games on Facebook , or follow on Twitter .  And be sure to check out my games on  Tabletop Generation.

GJJG Game Reviews are independent, unpaid reviews of games I, George Jaros, have played with my family and friends.  Some of these games I own, some are owned by friends, some are borrowed, and some are print and play versions of games.  Where applicable I will indicate if games have been played with kids or adults or a mix (Family Play).  I won't go into extensive detail about how to play the game (there are plenty of other sources for that information and I'll occasionally link to those other sources), but I will give my impressions of the game and how my friends and family reacted to the game.  A score of 1-10 (low-high) is given to each game in six categories: Components & Packaging, Rules & Setup, Gameplay, Replayability, Overall Value, and General Fun.  Rules & Setup and General Fun are weighted double and Gameplay is weighted triple.  Educational games have an extra category and Gameplay is only weighted double. Then the game is given a total score of x/100.

People Behind the Meeples - Episode 106: Cody Thompson

Welcome to People Behind the Meeples, a series of interviews with indie game designers.  Here you'll find out more than you ever wanted to know about the people who make the best games that you may or may not have heard of before.  If you'd like to be featured, head over to http://gjjgames.blogspot.com/p/game-designer-interview-questionnaire.html and fill out the questionnaire! You can find all the interviews here: People Behind the Meeples. Support me on Patreon!

---

Name:	Cody Thompson
Email:	gold.nugget.games.llc@gmail.com
Location:	Tacoma, WA
Day Job:	Architectural Drafter
Designing:	Six months to a year.
Webpage:	goldnuggetgames.com
BGG:	Gold Nugget Games
Facebook:	GoldNuggetGames/
Twitter:	@GoldNuggetGame
YouTube:	Gold Nugget Games
Find my games at:	Hopefully we will find out soon

Today's Interview is with:

Cody Thompson
Interviewed on: 12/29/2017

Cody Thompson is the founder of Gold Nugget Games, a new game publisher from Tacoma, Washington. He's working on publishing Chef's Choice by Charlie Hoopes and also has his game, Mine Mine Mine, in The Game Crafter's hookbox challenge. He's an active member of many of the game design groups on Facebook and elsewhere, so if you see him, say hi! Read on to learn more about Cody and his current projects.

Some Basics
Tell me a bit about yourself.

How long have you been designing tabletop games?
Six months to a year.

Why did you start designing tabletop games?
Because I love games of all types and have recently gotten into modern board games and have fell in love. (And of course so that I can quit my job and buy and Island... Duh)

What game or games are you currently working on?
I am currently working on a game of my own with the working title of Mine Mine Mine. And just signed a game to publish from another designer, with two more designers in that I am interested in signing and we are working out the details.

Have you designed any games that have been published?
In 2-4 months I will have :)

What is your day job?
Architectural Drafter

Your Gaming Tastes
My readers would like to know more about you as a gamer.

Where do you prefer to play games?
Preferably on a table, but until just recently before we got a fold up table we have been playing on the floor

Who do you normally game with?
My girlfriend 99% of the time currently. Unless its video games, then I can play with my family and friends that live farther away

If you were to invite a few friends together for game night tonight, what games would you play?
Currently Charterstone, but I just recently picked up Hellapagos which is designed for 3-12 players but we have only played it with 2 so far. But games like Cards against Humanity is fun to play with my family whenever we all get together.

And what snacks would you eat?
I would eat all of them. (New Years Resolution is to leave some for guests as well)

Do you like to have music playing while you play games? If so, what kind?
Never really thought of that. There might be background noise from the TV, but we have never intentionally played music while playing.

What’s your favorite FLGS?
Uncle Games in the Tacoma mall. My wallet wants me to do more online shopping. But the convenience and their staff (Becky) keeps us coming back and emptying the wallet.

What is your current favorite game? Least favorite that you still enjoy? Worst game you ever played?
Current favorite, Charterstone. Least favorite that I still enjoy, Citadel of Time, Just because we haven't beat it yet, we have come 1 turn from beating it 5 times, once I beat it I will never play it again. Worst game ever played, obviously Monopoly (thats the game I'm supposed to say as a designer right?)

What is your favorite game mechanic? How about your least favorite?
Favorite mechanic has got to be deckbuilding (also my girlfriend’s favorite). Least favorite I don't think I have played enough yet to determine.

What’s your favorite game that you just can’t ever seem to get to the table?
Ashes: Rise of the Phoenixborn. We have only played it about 5 times so far. We both love the game. Have bought more expansions then times played. And just can’t seem to get it to the table no matter how many times I try.

What styles of games do you play?
I like to play Board Games, Card Games, Miniatures Games, Video Games

Do you design different styles of games than what you play?
I like to design Board Games, Card Games

OK, here's a pretty polarizing game. Do you like and play Cards Against Humanity?
Yes

You as a Designer
OK, now the bit that sets you apart from the typical gamer. Let's find out about you as a game designer.

When you design games, do you come up with a theme first and build the mechanics around that? Or do you come up with mechanics and then add a theme? Or something else?
THEME, THEME, THEME. And then come up with mechanics to fit it. (Except coincidentally the first game I am going to publish was mechanics first. It started as X's and O's and bombs. But then got a theme and then the mechanics changed to fit it

Have you ever entered or won a game design competition?
No. But entering into my first in a couple weeks. So hopefully yes.

Do you have a current favorite game designer or idol?
Jamey Stegmaier, Ryan Laukat, Brian Henk

Where or when or how do you get your inspiration or come up with your best ideas?
At work, driving in the car, taking a shower, or reading.

How do you go about playtesting your games?
I have a playtester form on my website, and then just direct marketing in facebook groups with links to a google drive

Do you like to work alone or as part of a team? Co-designers, artists, etc.?
So far most of my work is alone with the services of an artist (I can't draw to save anybody’s life), but I really like the aspect of being a project manager working as a team

What do you feel is your biggest challenge as a game designer?
Finishing (which I think is everyone's biggest challenge). Ideas are a dime a dozen. Actually bringing that idea to life... maybe a few hundred dollars

If you could design a game within any IP, what would it be?
Monster Hunter for passion. Any Nintendo or Monopoly IP for money.

What do you wish someone had told you a long time ago about designing games?
Just do it!

What advice would you like to share about designing games?
Just do it!

Would you like to tell my readers what games you're working on and how far along they are?
Games that will soon be published are: 2 currently (possibly 4)
I'm planning to crowdfund: 2 currently (possibly 4)
Games I feel are in the final development and tweaking stage are: 1
Games that I'm playtesting are: 1
Games that are in the early stages of development and beta testing are: 1
And games that are still in the very early idea phase are: Googolplex

Are you a member of any Facebook or other design groups? (Game Maker’s Lab, Card and Board Game Developers Guild, etc.)
A ton. If you’re on there, chances are I'm on there.

And the oddly personal, but harmless stuff…
OK, enough of the game stuff, let's find out what really makes you tick! These are the questions that I’m sure are on everyone’s minds!

Star Trek or Star Wars? Coke or Pepsi? VHS or Betamax?
Star Wars. Neither. Netflix

What hobbies do you have besides tabletop games?
Sports of all kinds, Video Games, Cooking, and Learning

What is something you learned in the last week?
I spend about 25 hours a day learning, so take your pick

Favorite type of music? Books? Movies?
All types except Metal and Screamo. Blogs. All types

What was the last book you read?
.....

Do you play any musical instruments?
I wish

Tell us something about yourself that you think might surprise people.
I went to a school that was P-12th grade that had 186 kids. My sister’s graduating class was 4

Tell us about something crazy that you once did.
Everything in high school. Small school. No rules

Biggest accident that turned out awesome?
I spun my ankle around backwards in high school. Now I have a sweet scar. Still deciding if that is worth the price of admission.

Who is your idol?
Elon Musk

What would you do if you had a time machine?
Go back just before the industrial revolution and do things the right way.

Are you an extrovert or introvert?
Extrovert until I get in trouble, then introvert.

If you could be any superhero, which one would you be?
Iron Man (aka Elon Musk)

Have any pets?
We just got a puppy. A corgi/Pomeranian names Nugget!

When the next asteroid hits Earth, causing the Yellowstone caldera to explode, California to fall into the ocean, the sea levels to rise, and the next ice age to set in, what current games or other pastimes do you think (or hope) will survive into the next era of human civilization? What do you hope is underneath that asteroid to be wiped out of the human consciousness forever?
Doesn't matter because I would be in the ocean or on mars at that point. But if it did matter I would hope that as many games as possible made it because everyone has a different taste. And I would want all destructive human technology to be wiped away but with the current knowledge of how to proceed better without them

If you’d like to send a shout out to anyone, anyone at all, here’s your chance (I can’t guarantee they’ll read this though):
Brian Henk for giving me the inspiration and confidence to become a designer/publisher, Jamey Stegmaier for building on what Brian started, and my girlfriend Asia Reese for being behind me every step of the way

Just a Bit More
Thanks for answering all my crazy questions! Is there anything else you'd like to tell my readers?

Play games, have fun, and only take life seriously enough.

---

Thank you for reading this People Behind the Meeples indie game designer interview! You can find all the interviews here: People Behind the Meeples and if you'd like to be featured yourself, you can fill out the questionnaire here: http://gjjgames.blogspot.com/p/game-designer-interview-questionnaire.html

Did you like this interview?  Pleasse show your support: Support me on Patreon! Or click the heart at Board Game Links , like GJJ Games on Facebook , or follow on Twitter .  And be sure to check out my games on  Tabletop Generation.